Skip to content

Past-paper RC · IPMAT Indore 2022 RC

Jenner, Cline and the first vaccinations

history-humanities · 453 words · 6 questions

By 1798, Jenner had succeeded in demonstrating the protective quality of the cowpox virus against smallpox, by putting on record details of 23 cases, contracted either casually or by direct inoculation.

Sixteen of these had occurred accidentally among dairy workers in the course of occupations connected with cows and horses; the rest were done under Jenner’s direction.

Among the persons inoculated was Jenner’s own little second son, Robert Harding Jenner, an infant eleven months old.

Jenner demonstrated conclusively that the cowpox protects the human constitution from the infection of smallpox.

After Dr. Jenner had made his tests, he prepared a pamphlet for publication.

He also went to London, so that he might have the opportunity to introduce the subject personally to friends and demonstrate the truth of his assertion to them.

He remained in London for nearly three months without being able to find anyone who would submit to vaccination.

Jenner went back to Gloucestershire, disappointed.

It happened, however, that soon after his return home, a distinguished London surgeon named Cline resolved to make a trial of the vaccine material which Jenner had left with his friends.

The patient was a child suffering from a form of chronic hip-joint disease.

The vaccine material was inoculated, and the vaccine vehicle ran rather a normal course and healed fully.

The little patient was afterward inoculated with smallpox virus and found to be incapable of acquiring that disease.

This case attracted considerable attention.

The child was in a run-down condition, and the vaccine material might very well have provoked a rather serious local reaction.

In a way, the fate of vaccination hung in the balance and good luck was in its favour.

Mr. Cline, however, after this, became a strong advocate of vaccination, and brought it very decidedly before the London physicians.

It was not long before the opposition to the practise of vaccination took definite form.

One of the best-known London physicians of the time, Dr. Ingenhouz, became the leader of a strong faction of the medical profession of London, who not only would have nothing to do with vaccination, but proclaimed openly that it was a dangerous innovation, absolutely unjustifiable, and communicated a disease without protecting against any other.

Dr. Watt from Glasgow blamed the vaccine for the increase in severe cases of measles and measles-related deaths among children.

Fortunately, only a few colleagues were so illogical, and an excellent idea of how much Jenner’s discovery was appreciated by his contemporaries may be obtained from the number of honours, diplomas, addresses and communications from public bodies and distinguished individuals which he received.

Most of the prominent medical and scientific societies of Europe elected him a member or sent him some special token of recognition.

1.Jenner received a lot of recognition from medical bodies because
  • A.Fortunately, only a few colleagues were illogical enough to reject him.
  • B.Dr. Watt could not prove that vaccination caused measles.
  • C.Medical societies across Europe regularly engaged in tokenism.
  • D.Most of his colleagues realised the effectiveness of his work.
2.By calling the vaccine unjustifiable, Dr. Ingenhouz meant that vaccination
  • A.Was an injustice against those on whom it was tested.
  • B.Made people sick and failed to provide general immunity.
  • C.Was being carried out without any legal basis.
  • D.Actually spread the disease to a large population.
3.According to the author, the main idea in the passage is
  • A.Scientific breakthroughs are more likely to happen in major urban centres.
  • B.Documentation is key for disseminating science.
  • C.Chance and risk play a part in the success of scientific experiments.
  • D.To explore the causes for vaccine hesitancy.
4.On returning from London, Dr. Jenner was disappointed because
  • A.He was unsuccessful in replicating the experiment due to lack of volunteers.
  • B.His friends would not agree with his findings on the vaccine.
  • C.His friends responded negatively to the vaccine.
  • D.The vaccine did not receive any recognition, rewards, or a patent.
5.Twenty-three cases were put on record with the objective to explain very clearly that
  • A.It is beneficial to immunity if we work with cows and horses.
  • B.The cowpox vaccine protected the patients from another deadly disease.
  • C.Dr. Jenner was ready to go to any extent, even testing the vaccine on his own son.
  • D.Accidental contraction of cowpox happens among dairy workers.
6.‘Local reaction’ refers to
  • A.Encouraging reaction from local doctors.
  • B.Adverse reaction caused by injections.
  • C.Encouraging reaction from the people of the locality.
  • D.Adverse comments and protests by people from that location.

Want to practise this under exam conditions?

Sign in free for timed RC sets with evidence highlighting, so you see exactly which sentence supports each answer.

Sign in to practise
IPMAT Indore 2022 RC: Jenner, Cline and the first vaccinations (passage, questions and solutions) · IPMATway